Feminism -------- See also MGTOW - Men Going Their Own Way Frankfurt School of Cultural Marxism Cultural Marxism - Critical Theory http://www.newswithviews.com/Roberts/carey13.htm dead http://no-maam.blogspot.com/ http://no-maam.blogspot.com/2008/08/have-women-invented-anything.html http://savethemales.ca/ http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/ http://www.avoiceformen.com/ http://www.returnofkings.com/ ---------- Shepard of http://engforum.pravda.ru - his signature: Combating Feminist Misinformation!!! I would like to see those politicians and feminists who have promoted man-hatred and family breakdown one day languishing in a prison cell. After all, politicians and feminists who have set out to hurt innocent others in pursuit of their own aims should be punished quite severely. http://news.mensactivism.org/ http://www.falserapesociety.blogspot.com/ http://www.mediaradar.org/ www.angryharry.com http://www.debunker.com/patriarchy.html -------------- http://www.aei.org/article/100695 Persistent Myths in Feminist Scholarship By Christina Hoff Sommers | Chronicle of Higher Education Monday, June 29, 2009 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1203295/Why-women-want-work-look-children.html;jsessionid=5A748F48C0D65F9BBB878BCB2CCF8E90 Why a third of women want to give up work to look after their children More than a third of working mothers want to quit their jobs to look after their children, research suggests. A further six in ten would like to reduce their hours to spend more time with their young ones, the Government-backed study found. In the 1990s, feminists exhorted women to leave their homes and go to work. The feminists didn't say women should have a choice in the matter. The social expectation of home-maker was simply replaced with a new social expectation of career path. The door was not merely opened into the executive quite; women were kicked through it. Indeed women who wanted to stay at home with their children were looked on as socially inferior. Then the economy started to change and women in the workplace discovered they could not go back to staying at home with the kids. Two working parents became the social norm, with the government happy as hell to collect the additional taxes. Raising the children fell to the school/indoctrination centers and TV. Mom's home-cooked meals gave way to processed food. Profits and revenues went up while the social and health consequences continued to climb. Behind the revenue stream was a darker issue. In hindsight, the push to make women independent came with a parallel program to demonize men, call them all potential rapists, and make them disposable. Looking back it was obvious even then that a prolonged war was being planned and men had to be freed up to be soldiers. The 1990s was a repeat of the "Rosie the Riveter" campaign that lured WW2 women out of their homes and into the factories so that the men could be shipped off to be killed in war. After WW2 ended the media pushed the image of "mother at home" as new fashion ideal. TV shows like "Leave it to Beaver" and "Father knows best" persuaded women to leave the factories in order that returning soldiers would find jobs. It was all social engineering and manipulation and while it may have worked well in the 1950s, women today with a sense of history are realizing they have been scammed and that what they thought was freedom of choice was really just another imposed societal expectation. The extra cash they thought they would earn has all but vanished into higher taxes and child-care costs, not to mention the expensive wardrobe, second car and other accouterments of the modern workplace. Meanwhile women are just now realize what men have known all along; it is painful to watch ones children grow up from afar. Women want out. But they are trapped just as trapped as they were told they were when they stayed at home with the kids. http://www.henrymakow.com/why_young_men_are_avoiding_mar.html Why Young Men Are Avoiding Marriage October 14, 2009 "Young women are dishonest, self-involved, slutty, manipulative, shallow, controlling, and gold-digging." By Kay S. Hymowitz http://www.henrymakow.com/the_effect_of_sexual_deprivati.html The Effect of Sexual Deprivation on Women (Encore) by Henry Makow Ph.D. http://thenononsenseman.com/Media/WhyWomenHateLeykis.pdf 20100906 http://www.unionleader.com/article.aspx?headline=Plotting+ex-wife+gets+7-14+years+in+jail&articleId=14addb23-2910-4e11-8279-d6466abd6fe5 Plotting ex-wife gets 7-14 years in jail (gone) 20101008 http://www.avoiceformen.com/2010/10/04/legally-obscene/ California is forcing 15 year old boy to pay child support to his (Statutory) rapist! There you have it.... Not only she is not charged for having sex with underage child (STATUTORY RAPE LAWS) but she is rewarded for breaking the law.... One law for men another for women.... 20110527 http://www.henrymakow.com/women_are_whack_jobs.html Young Man: Women Today are "Whack Jobs" WOMEN PROGRAMMED TO SELF-DESTRUCT. FEMINIST CULTURAL LEADERS ARE TRAITORS Deprived of their natural role as wives and mothers, encouraged to be promiscuous and lesbian, young women quite simply are going out of their minds. "Most women are confused, anti-social, filled with anxiety and fear, and when you approach them, they treat you like a predator or a pervert. Those who are friendly only want sex, even if they're already in a relationship, or worse, already married." by Peter Tesky 20120113 http://www.henrymakow.com/my_generation_was_thrown_to_th.html 20121210 http://www.jimstonefreelance.com/crackhead.html A thoughtful message to the Rockefellers and all associated filth Jim Stone, 12/10/12 Be careful what you wish for - Social attitudes have incentive effects. A pervasive attitude to the effect that all men are potential rapists, that even an unwanted glance should be legally actionable, and that what matters most is women's feelings rather than objective standards of justice, will cause barriers to spring up between the sexes that only the very bravest men will attempt to surmount... the great majority of women who self-identify as feminists are simply unable to grasp what their "movement" has wrought. Francis Porretto at bastionofliberty.blogspot.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 20141218 Jim Stone - Sexodus Why the sexodus is really happening Many readers have probably already heard other perspectives on this topic, here is mine. Why are American men opting out of relationships with American women? The answer is both long and easy to state if one is willing to be honest and possibly take a ratings hit for the truth. This is it entirely (as I see it) and after I state the problem, I will state the reason and who did it. A majority of American women grow up spoiled, with everything handed to them on a silver platter. In the schools, which are now rigged to destroy men, girls are given better grades for no reason at all other than to put them above the boys and make them more able to get into college. Boys have to work much harder and be far more talented to match the grades girls get in school, and often when any topic is technical or scientific a boy can be a genius and still get very poor grades on works such as science fair projects or anything else that requires a good technical understanding of a technical subject and actually making it work. There will be no appreciation for genius from any boy in American public schools nowadays. That went out with the 80's. Once these girls, who were pumped all the way through grade school hit college, they get professors who teach them that they have been abused, victimized and subverted their entire lives (all the while they in fact had it easy, far easier than the boys.) Since the professors talk from a position of "authority," even the boys go along with it and a cycle of behavior gets entrenched that is very destructive and leads to a situation where no matter what is done, the girls can never be satisfied with anything. They are always "the victim" no matter how good they have it. A majority of the women are then incapable of having a two way relationship. They enter a perfectly selfish mode where if their every whim is not answered without compromise, they are "abused" and "crushed" and whatever other things they dream up and can convince people of. If a man enters a relationship with such a woman (which is now the norm in the below 30 group and even a huge percentage of those in the 30-45 group) he risks having his life explode in divorce courts which are subsequently rigged to bring out the worst possible monsters the women can possibly muster, courts which can destroy a man for his entire useful life. And most do get destroyed. This was a secret for a while, but word has gotten around and men are no longer stupid about this. For what reason should they open themselves up to being a 100 percent servant, who if he does not serve the woman to her perfect satisfaction faces complete destruction in court? I know a lot of women are spitting over this, but it is the cold hard truth, a truth most will never see. Rather than see the truth, most women will fall into a depression caused by a malfunctioning system which targeted them directly, and used them to destroy their country. If there is no such thing as a stable home simply because the women demand far too much and destroy on a whim when they do not get what they want, America will fail and is already failing. Then, as a final sucker punch, these women who were tricked into a destructive lifestyle that caused them enormous depression are deemed to have a chemical imbalance, prescribed antidepressants and from that point on they are unrecoverable. The antidepressants target the emotional centers and blow them away permanently, especially those which are needed for empathy, compassion, and caring about others. They become consuming machines that eat everything in their path (for a period of time) and then burn out completely and recede from society only to live alone with three cats, occasionally visited by other female friends who were similarly destroyed, to chat about how bad they have it and that is why life somehow passed them by. The real reason "life passed them by" is never known by any of them. Here it is: When I first approached the Jewish community, I had full access to all the books in the Bnai Jacob Montreal synagogue and it was shocking what they had in that synagogue about the true nature of women. They study this, and use it to plot to destroy societies. One of the key things is that money is paramount for a majority of women, it is THE THING they go for and if societal laws or norms are not in place to discourage or prevent it, they will even sell their children to get it. This is not what I am saying, it is what they know and they use this nature of women to get them to shut off their conscience enough to have them feel perfectly justified in lying to destroy men in court, especially when there is a financial payout involved. The Jews ran cold war Russia, and SSRI antidepressants, America's family policy, and many of the police state laws as well as the destructive educational programs were first test run in Russia. I doubt the same people who developed these things in Russia are still there after the fall, they are in America, in the courts, colleges, and social service sector brain raping the women and ripping the guts out of America. If you want the real reason for the sexodus in America, as far as I see it, it is the end result of a communist plot to destroy America that has run its course almost to completion. And I doubt the nation will recover, if there is a way to recover this nation it will be had via direct threat to the Jewish districts of New York, San Francisco, and other major Jewish centers. They taught us that violence is wrong, but they use violence on a whim everywhere (and if you do not think there is even one example of this just look at Gaza.) Lack of an ability to get nasty is in fact a psychiatric malfunction that has been entrenched and enforced in America by those who are destroying the nation. Peaceful protest does not cut it, cry all you want and tyranny will only laugh in return. Have you seen anything other than them laughing at our protests lately? Protests are a joke when a complete revolution is needed. Until this happens, enjoy living alone in a stupid "sexodus" which in reality, on the face of things absent any changes, is the only rational option for the American male. Until the social policy is responded to as the act of war it is and subsequently blown away, one would be stupid to go into the belly of the monster. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- March 19 2015 The women rant Sandi wrote: The women Rant: Jim..I am a petite female. I totally understand and agree with (most of) what you say about women. But here is where you are lacking...the planned destruction of the family, and what we need to do to turn it around. The generations from the 70's until now have NOT had the rearing/bringing up that we had in the 50's & 60's. My father, who was 100% war disabled, raised us to do everything he did. I helped fix cars, tractors, furnaces, plumbing, washer, dryer, electrical, carpentry, run a business, etc. My mother taught us about running a home, cooking, cleaning, sewing, managing money, etc. Furthermore, they let us fall, and then we picked our own sorry asses up and LEARNED. Both of my parents, together, showed us how to be well rounded, independent, morally sound beings, and tackle nearly any adversity that would come our way, then or now.. Now I can do anything either of them could do (if it doesn't require extremely heavy lifting), and more. I can invent and create things...out of necessity or planned; make a job out of nothing, to earn a wage; I can outshoot most; drive a muscle car or motorcycle; break a horse; cave dive; and I can hold my own in nearly any conversation about anything, ETC. My point is this Jim...Men/fathers MUST raise their children to do everything they know how to do (as well as the women/mothers), and push the children to figure out the other things. Raise both boys and girls equally, with no bias to sex. Kids that weren't raised properly are the problem now, and have become the kind of nasty women you speak of. The kids didn't ask for the way they were raised... And when they must do it on their own, it takes much longer, and they may never be able to be productive beings. I dare say that IF they have to figure it out on their own, very few will ever succeed. What is pissing you off is the outcome of the planned degradation of our societies. This has been in the workings since early 1900, and implemented around 1933. People blindly heading into the future, blinded by broken families, mind control, propaganda, poisoned food, water, and air. Lighten up on the blame, Jim. Use your voice to instill in all who follow you what they should be doing to change the world, anger and blame are destructive, and don't work. WE ARE IN THIS TOGETHER, AND NEED EACH OTHER EQUALLY. Life is is supposed to be balanced (night/day, good/bad right/wrong), etc. We can't have one without the other, and nothing survives unless it remains in balance. My response Have you ever heard of the Christian rock group Petra? They have a song called "computer brains" and that is where I first heard the term garbage in / garbage out presented in a way that would really stick. The current state of American women/men reflects this perfectly. What I have not mentioned is that though men are more resistant to "garbage in", the efforts being made in the universities now, and influence of the mass media, coupled with bad upbringing has caused the men to be garbage (at least at a young age for practically all) and the few good women there are left out there do not have many options either. However, it all started with the corruption of the women, because they were and are an easier target. The "elite" knew this, to destroy the women, the men had to first be reduced to a value of zero, which was accomplished with the bogus domestic abuse scam, and overwhelming police state power to enforce the scam in all cases, where no evidence or event had to take place to bury a man forever under a false domestic abuse charge. This left American homes devoid of men, and they could not be there to ensure a proper upbringing of the children. It is a well proven fact that Women fail at this without a man around. Then the women had to be brainwashed in college to destroy their families by enforcing this scam, and with the men removed from the homes, the destruction of the boys then was able to proceed in public schools because the women could not see it happening the way a man would and put a stop to it. Now everything is trash. On average, however, the men resisted moral destruction better than the women did and in general make good husbands (as any Latina will say,) and foreign women are aware of this. That is why foreign women will come to America for husbands and subsequently stay married. If American men really were bad, this would not happen. On the other hand, foreign men walk straight into disasters with American women. It's a well entrenched world theme. If I was an American woman who somehow avoided destruction, knowing what I know, I would run like the wind from any young man who wanted casual sex or believed the feminist mind wipe and that "anything goes". The door at present swings both ways, young men have never been worse than they are now, for a decent woman it is a mine field. For as long as this zionist/elitist plot remains in place in America, there will be no recovery. Lynchings, hangings, nukings, mass killings will have to take place to root this out, I swear, I pray for an invasion from Russia that rooted every last one of these animals out of the power structure, Americans are too mind whipped and NSA raped to ever mount an effective resistance, this time if the problem is going to be fixed, America needs to lose a war BADLY and go through "regime change" enforced from outside the country. At least Putin expresses strong Christian values and actually acts on them. What is America's equivalent now? The grove and Molech. Stark difference there, who would you rather have in charge? In the past America was great. But the zionist front (which is now led by Nut Yahoo and directed by Sir Rothchild) has screwed America over so badly that Americans would probably be better off as a cold war era Soviet satellite country. America has progressed far beyond that level of tyranny. WHAT WOULD BE BETTER, THAT, OR THIS: If we get caught they will just replace us with persons of the same cloth. So it does not matter what you do, America is a golden calf and we will suck it dry, chop it up, and sell it off piece by piece until there is nothing left but the world's biggest welfare state that we will create and control. Why? Because it is the will of God and America is big enough to take the hit so we can do it again and again and again. This is what we do to countries that we hate. We destroy them very slowly and make them suffer for refusing to be our slaves." - Benjamin Netanyahoo Nut Yahoo's statement is a stark declaration that America is under the control of people who revel in the disasters they cause. The destruction of the family is one such disaster. What would you rather have? A soviet style clamp down where after the economy is converted things go to a controlled economic system and business as usual in other ways, with crappy products but no one starves as long as they comply, or to live under the reign of zionist animals who continuously seek to destroy every aspect of your life, from family to your education to your health just because they hate you? Obviously both are bad choices, I'd rather have the old America back, but at this point it is obviously not an option. What would you choose? Food you hate, or poison that will actually kill you? That is the crossroad America is now at. After what I have seen happen to America under Nut Yahoo style thinking, after seeing the results, communism, where at least a family is allowed without getting totally messed with by intentional social manipulation that causes it to self destruct would be a far better option. At least there would be a real home and family to go to. Is that not, in reality, the real number one? ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 20150912 http://www.cracktwo.com/2015/09/womans-amazing-open-letter-about-men.html 20160624 http://libertyfight.com/2016/domestic-violence-bias.html Advocate Warns: "Male Domestic Violence Victims Should Not Seek Help in San Diego or Anywhere Else" Paul Elam of 'An Ear for Men' has a very interesting video analysis of the San Diego, CA District Attorney's recent video targeting domestic violence victims. During the video, he points out an undeniable bias against men, as well as a very interesting study which notes "286 scholarly investigations, 221 empirical studies and 65 reviews and/or analyses, which demonstrate that women are as physically aggressive, or more aggressive, than men in their relationships with their spouses or male partners. The aggregate sample size in the reviewed studies exceeds 371,600. [Martin S. Fiebert, Department of Psychology, Cal State University, Long Beach] 20160624 http://forums.avoiceformen.com/showthread.php?11267-572-different-studies-covering-371-600-people-show-women-are-more-violent 572 different studies covering 371,600 people show women are more violent. 20161125 Via http://www.woodpilereport.com/ http://urbansurvival.com/coping-with-five-realities-of-outback-living/ This an excerpted comment from George Ure's Urban Survival. It's been in my que for a long time, a good place to use it never presented itself, but it's too good to keep archived any longer. Men have almost no reproductive rights. Children have almost no reproductive rights. Thus the entire future of the society is in the hands of mainly young women being economically, socially, hormonally and emotional whipsawed by a civilization that is driven by nonhuman values. The consequences are a catastrophe. Young men I know ... conclude family formation, or even close heterosexual relations are fools’ games. Both parties have the initial choice to mate or not. At age 21, there is not a lot of rational reflection about that ”choice”. Especially with the birth control options available, and the fudging about real world failure rates the kids are still unaware of at that age. Like 9% annual failure rate for the pill. Far worse for barrier methods. Would you drive a car that had a 9% or greater chance of an injury accident EVERY year? Of course not, but having sex is not a rational decision, most times. Then if there’s a baby, the young man has no actual choices left, as a practical matter. ALL the choices thereafter are those of the mommy. Kill baby or not kill the baby. Put baby up for adoption, or keep baby. Stay with Daddy or dump Daddy. Marriage optional, cuz Daddy pays either way. If baby is both born alive and disabled, Mommy decides whether to adopt baby out or keep baby. If she goes on welfare, Daddy must not live with his family, ever. Mommy decides. If she keeps baby, Daddy is on the hook for caring for baby for Daddy’s life, plus Daddy’s estate owes everything, potentially to past and future care of baby. This makes Daddy a very poor marriage prospect for other women. Reduced income, alternate weekends and one night a week blown, plus emotional and financial ongoing costs of children not even in the home, who likely resent Step-Mommy. Mommy, on the other hand, can marry or hook up again, with a nearly guaranteed support check. And if she likes, the new man can be called and treated like Daddy. Even if Daddy dies, Social Security steps in and pays, and health insurance? Daddy. College? Probably Daddy... What does Daddy get? Diddlysquat, mainly, plus emotional and financial Hell. Where do we sign up for this great deal? ... The whole thing sucks. Young men know it, and many if not most grew up watching it. And they don’t see the percentages in stepping up and acting like mature men, working themselves sick for their family, in a system that treats them as slaves and suckers, with no authority, no power and no respect. And no family except Disney-dadding it for a few weekends and a weekly date night for Mommy. --------------- 20161225 https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/5k2xay/a_feminist_is_a_woman_who_hates_men_because_she/ A feminist is a woman who hates men because she is ugly on the inside and out and no one wants to be around her. That's the new definition 20170601 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3LqbqUMXinQ Cassie Jaye: Why I Stopped Being a Feminist Comment: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3LqbqUMXinQ&lc=z12td32wvmvgche1b22yjnhxkorig1hla Google 'feminism communism destruction of family'. Also a few links here: http://everist.org/archives/links/__Feminism.txt Feminism is a movement deliberately constructed by Elites (wearing their Communist mask, one of many) with the specific intent of destroying Western society. This is a component of a deeper goal to drastically reduce world population via social collapse and resulting inevitable massive chaos and disaster. Like all fake movements, Feminism takes a few seemingly sound ideas, adds a lot of bullshit, and twists the result into something deeply corrupting and evil. But those who accept the ubiquitous social conditioning propaganda have little hope of ever understanding how they've been fooled. Salutes to Cassie Jayes for breaking through the conditioning. But sadly, most women (and men) trapped in the 'Feminism' world-view hall of lies will never escape. http://captaincapitalism.blogspot.com.au/2017/05/the-case-for-evil.html Extract: Paralleling very closely to the plight of blacks are another prey of the bad in this country - women. Certainly the democrat party view women as a victim class to advance and enrich themselves, but feminism and feminists are the true villains in this movie. Wanting to avoid real work at any cost, feminism and feminists have created and entire victim-whoring industry out of whole cloth. And they did so by telling women the most damaging of lies. Women are men. Gender is a social construct. You don't need a man. Being a mom/stay at home wife is oppression. You are oppressed. The glass ceiling. Patriarchy. The wage gap. Etc. Surprise, surprise again it is only feminism and feminists that can solve and remedy these injustices. And the way we do this apparently is by creating entire departments of women's studies, channeling women into "social justice" or "liberal arts" fields (where they coincidentally pay $100,000 for worthless degrees), financing make work government programs to employ these otherwise unemployable people, replacing men with government checks, and convincing women that working, paying taxes, and a career is more important than having a husband or children. But at what price? There are now three full generations of women (baby boomers, Gen X and now millennials) who put a paycheck, a career, their politics, feminism, and their education ahead of their biological and heart-felt desires to have and raise a family. They'll never admit it, but they're miserable and have wasted their entire lives. But at least the bad feminists made off $100,000 in tuition, Oprah is a billionaire, Jimmy Choo made a lot of money on shoes, corporate America got some cheap labor, the government got a lot of tax revenue, and the democrats/labour/socialist party got a lot of votes. What's only worse than the ruination of millions of women's lives is how they still claim to be independent minded when they were so obviously hoodwinked and screwed over by feminism. 20171015 http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/10/14/are-weak-if-make-your-man-sandwich-this-is-why-real-men-don-t-marry-feminists.html 20171129 http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2017/11/27/feminism-site-medusa-magazine-shuts-down-after-founder-admits-it-was-pure-satire.html 20180331 Jim Stone" The latest music by female singers is pure destruction I have not listened to music for several years. I have been so caught up in the world's political problems I have not cared to listen at all. However, a couple days ago I went to fix my brother in law's car and he was late out of bed and took a while to come to the door, so I hooked up some speakers I put in the back of the car a couple years ago because I never cared to hook them up . . . . until now. A few minutes later and the radio (which had totally trash speakers) sounded OK. So I have been listening to it. And I noticed something with all the songs in English - I do not know who these singers are, (probably J-lo and Rianna) or similar. But they are pushing songs that are pure societal destruction. Far worse than George Michael's "I want your sex" and the other crap that was so "horrible" - the songs these singers are singing are pure psychological programming to get women to hate men and live alone. One example is one where she is going through the reasons why she should throw a man out and "don't pick up the phone, he's drunk and alone" And another one talks all about "I am beautiful" and then she sings to the women listening saying "You are beautiful" and don't take crap from anyone, and it sounds like a classic song but the message is pure self aggrandizement and selfishness, but the one that REALLY set me off played over the speakers at Wal Mart. It was about being lonely. The song basically went like this: Why do we need someone? Is it worth it to tolerate someone else just to avoid being lonely? And then she says to the guy in bed with her: You are only here because you are lonely and I am filling a need you think you have (with the implication being the guy is worthless, and she should be happy without him and not put up with the fact that he has some sort of "need" to not be lonely.) And the basic gist of the song was to tell women that their lives can be full and happy even if they are lonely, tell the guy to go to hell. There are many others, but those are the three that really tweaked me. What on earth happened to music? Who on earth got in charge of it and started using EVERY SINGLE SONG SUNG BY AMERICAN WOMEN WITHOUT EXCEPTION THAT I HAVE HEARD SO FAR as a venue for making women hate men, to convince women that men are worthless and they should just live alone? Someone in Hollywood needs to hang for that, there is no way these women wrote those songs, they are cold calculated destruction from the deepest most evil think tank, and these women sing them with conviction, perhaps because they are too stupid to know what they are doing. No one in their right mind would ever say that sh**, it is all just like the song "We'll sing in the sunshine" where the woman starts out with the first line: I will never love you The cost of love's too dear But though I'll never love you I'll stay with you one year I'll sing to you each mornin' I'll kiss you every night But darlin', don't cling to me I'll soon be out of sight My daddy he once told me "Hey, don't you love you any man" "Just take what they may give you" "And give but what you can" But we can sing in the sunshine We'll laugh every da-a-y We'll sing in the sunshine Then I'll be on my way" Who the * wrote that sick POS? All anyone focused on was how nice the "we'll sing in the sunshine" line was, but I'd really like to know who her worthless dad was (doubt she wrote it) probably Rockefeller or Rothschild or Soros, someone seriously sick. They don't live like that, but they certainly want us to, so our lives are total shambles and we are easy to control . . . . . and the stuff I heard over the newly fixed radio is EVEN WORSE! ------------------- 20180419 https://www.theburningplatform.com/2018/04/15/the-four-terrible-things-that-are-destroying-boys-in-our-culture/ 20180901 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3r6kKn5_hUc&feature=youtu.be The Hard Truth About Hypergamy | Rollo Tomassi and Stefan Molyneux 20180908 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UxpVwBzFAkw Why Women DESTROY NATIONS * / CIVILIZATIONS - and other UNCOMFORTABLE TRUTHS 20180912 http://joannenova.com.au/2018/09/forbidden-facts-and-papers-that-are-erased-thou-shalt-not-discuss-intelligence/ Forbidden facts and scientific papers that are erased: Thou shalt not discuss intelligence https://arxiv.org/pdf/1703.04184.pdf 20180913 http://www.eevblog.com/forum/chat/and-so-the-cancer-continues-to-spread/ 20181025 http://americandigest.org/mt-archives/myths_texts/the_list.php Gerard VanderLeun, an essayist with few equals, makes plain how women triumph over men in this exposition at American Digest entitled The List: Men might have a plan for making a rocket-propelled street luge, but they have none at all when it comes to human activities that stretch across decades — unless it involves such trifles as national defense or energy policy. Men seem to see items like this as actually important, but women know that what is really important is the command and control of male behavior. Hence, “Your Permanent Conduct Record” aka “The List.” 2018109 https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=91&v=-4EDhdAHrOg It's Not About The Nail Quote from a psychologist named Bette Newcape: ---- When it comes to talking about their problems and their worries with friends, men and women have completely different goals. When a man unburdens himself to his friends, what he is really doing is asking for help. "These are my problems. Assist me in coming up with solutions to them." When a woman unburdens herself, what she is really doing is asking for sympathy. "These are my problems. Isn't my life terrible because I have all these problems? Don't you feel sorry for me?" The reason why so many women think men are incapable of 'serious' emotion is because when a woman tells a man about her problems, he immediately does what men do: tries to fix them. This is a natural response; after all, it he were the one unburdening himself, that's what he'd want. Some suggestion as to how to fix the problems. Unfortunately, the woman doesn't want solutions, she wants sympathy, and since the man isn't commiserating, she believes he is unsympathetic and dispassionate toward her concerns despite that being very far from the truth. Likewise, the reason why so many men think women are flighty and over-emotional is because when a man tells a woman about his problems, she immediately does what women do, and talks about how she feels the same way when faced with similar problems and how horrible it is for him and so on, when what he wants is for her to offer him some solution. Neither gender's approach is wrong, nor are these approaches "uncaring" or "flighty". They merely reflect the differences in the way the brains of men and women are wired. ---- 20190419 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ig2SgfVLigQ How Women Weaken Nations (and why men let them) 20190830 https://old.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/cxf8c5/now_theyre_complaining_because_men_are_avoiding/ 20191114 https://old.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/dvryo4/will_these_people_ever_be_happy/ 20191209 https://www.naturalnews.com/2019-12-07-feminism-creating-miserable-outraged-women.html 20200724 https://thedonald.win/p/Gbam6YTR/man-the-50s-sucked-its-a-good-th/c/ Man, the 50’s sucked. It’s a good thing feminism came along and fixed everything 20210314 https://patriots.win/p/12hkrAhzhg/i-just-want-a-waifu/c/ Feminism - the idea that women are free when they serve their employers but slaves when they serve their husband and children. (And society, by creating future generations.) 20210317 Book: The Feminist Lie: It Was Never About Equality by Bob Lewis Feminist ideology has seeped into every aspect of our society. This book is a sobering true story of tragedy, suicide, and murder directly caused by feminism. It not only chronicles true stories that show feminism's discrimination against men, it's backed by peer-reviewed research. Additionally, it includes investigative journalism that proves feminism was never about equality. The reality is that feminism doesn't just victimize men. It also victimizes women, children, families, and communities. 20201409 https://www.returnofkings.com/116603/20-reasons-why-modern-women-are-so-unstable-and-miserable "20 reasons why modern women are so unstable and miserable"