The Port Arthur Massacre

Anything related to the alleged control and manipulation that the Government is involved in should be posted here.

Moderators: Andy, Soxism, Adam, queglay, Nooby

Re: The Port Arthur Massacre

Postby Altair » Mon Feb 16, 2009 9:06 pm

i have one of wendy scurs talks on video and its amazing...
this was one of the first things that sent me on my journey of truth seeking
its in a 2 part series

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UdYxtultxZU

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pJeQ3PgBe4U

i have found that there is a series of events from 1978 to port arthur that tie dr mullins and dr peters together (those who wrote the official report on port arthur and responsible for anti gun legislation in this country) and makes there involvment very suspicious
but thats my opinion
Image
User avatar
Altair
Truth Seeker
 
Posts: 9
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2009 1:01 pm

Re: The Port Arthur Massacre

Postby Tanya » Tue Feb 17, 2009 11:55 am

Oh Jonah,
Open your eyes or get off this site man.
Martin Bryant, IQ of 66, mental capacity of an 11 year old.
Why do you think he had a government pension Dear?
There are 3 sharp shooters in the world capable of that accuracy.
It was all about the gun buy back scheme, and it worked.
The 2 witnesses that survived and that were in the Broad Arrow cafe on the day, both said, IT WAS NOT MARTIN BRYANT!
Funnily enough, both died suddenly....
Wakey, wakey, little snakey!
Tanya
75+ Posts TMA Member!
 
Posts: 89
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 11:44 am

Re: The Port Arthur Massacre

Postby Abstrakt » Sat Feb 21, 2009 11:33 am

There is reason to think the Port Arthur massacre was planned as early 1987 when, after a specially called Premier's meeting in Hobart in December 1987, the New South Wales Labour Premier, Mr. Barry Unsworth stated, "there would be no effective gun control in Australia until there was a massacre in Tasmania".

BMO (Behavior Modification Operations) is a unique international corporate advisory company ready to fulfill your specific behavior modification requirements in support of organizational objectives in unstable areas and nations of the world. BMO is staffed by psychological warfare and military operations professionals who specializes in developing regions of Africa, the Middle East, Asia and South America.

By means of specially designed crises communications programs, BMO personnel are thoroughly trained to facilitate local acceptance of your organization's objectives at all levels of a given society, from leaders of developing nations to hostile local groups and communities. Simply put, we will ensure your operations are sympathetically supported by both antagonistic and indifferent local populations groups.

In our research and implementation programs, BMO will place at your organization's disposal only the most sophisticated, historically proven techniques developed and practiced by government agencies, armed forces and many diverse political/national movements. BMO operations combine historical precedence and trends with the strength of sciences such as cultural anthropology, social psychology, sociology, linguistics and mass communication including targeted public relation campaign communications to achieve your objectives.

BMO will work with your organization to provide effective influence over a given local population's opinions, emotions and attitudes with the purpose of changing the conduct of human environment in the area of your operation, to fulfil your specific objectives.

The truly unique and distinguishing feature of BMO services is our capability to implement behavioral change programs in the midst of situations such as low intensity conflict, tribal or ethnic warfare and collisions, social disturbances, riots and upheavals, insurgency and counterinsurgency contexts.

The types of communication media, the range of facilities as well as appeals employed and exposure duration (project length) will be tailored to your organization's budgetary considerations, target audiences with costs varying from print or electronic, word or mouth/indigenous forms of communication, or their combination, in order to achieve the desired goals.

Projects undertaken by BMO are always proceeded by thorough, highly detailed research and intelligence analysis collection phases to ensure well-calculated and professional implementation. This effort utilizes the ability of BMO psychological operations specialists to establish rapport with both hostile and friendly populations in country to gain access to the specific data on the area of interest to determine the effectiveness of the proposed operations.

If your organization has established communications goals it would like to achieve in a foreign area, BMO will work with your in-house staff to assist implementing or reinvigorating current programs to ensure their continuity utilizing BMO's unique operational methods.

At all times BMO activity will comply with local and international laws, regulations and customs. The ethical conduct of BMO specialists will never place your organization's reputation at risk in either home country or abroad, whereas an impeccable implementation of your foreign operations will help achieve increased international shareholder and investor confidence.

BMO is always willing to accommodate the corporate culture of a client. We offer maximum convenience in providing our staff to work on your project. Our integration modes:

1) Straight consultancy contract for crises communications services,

or

2) Secondment of our specialist to any of your departmental extensions overseas (be it PR, HR, Legal, etc.) so that the secondee will be veiled (hidden) in your organizational chart and will provide management information strictly to the designated executive for his/her discretionary use.

http://web.archive.org/web/20011204174809/www.milinfoserv.net/BMO.htm

Martin Bryant was monitored, directed, and, in all likelihood, programmed by Tavistock networks in Tasmania, from at least the time that one of Tavistock's senior representatives in Australia, the now 88-year-old Dr. Eric Cunningham Dax, first examined Bryant in 1983-84, and set the parameters for all his future "treatment."

Tavistock's methods were outlined by Dr. William Sargant in his 1950s book, {The Battle for the Mind: A physiology of conversion and brain-washing.}

In a 1961 series of lectures at the University of California Medical School, one of Sargant's closest collaborators, British novelist Aldous Huxley, assessed the notorious MK-Ultra mass drugging and brainwashing experiment which had been under way since the early 1950s. Huxley was the author of the 1952 book, {The Doors of Perception,} which first popularized LSD usage; he had long before fictionalized the results of such experimentation in his novel {Brave New World}. Huxley himself played a key role in MK-Ultra.

Dax was also a protege of Sargant. Sargant had initiated a brainwashing technique called "deep sleep," in which patients were given massive doses of drugs, to keep them asleep 20 hours or more a day, which increased their susceptibility to "programming."
Under Sargant's tutelage, Dax performed 1,300 experiments in deep sleep, and rapidly became one of Britain's top practitioners of so-called "physical methods" of psychiatry, which included pre-frontal lobotomies, on which Dax wrote a monograph, and electric shock, which was often administered during "deep sleep."

In 1969, Dax left his prestigious, highly influential position in Melbourne to go to the backwater state of Tasmania, an island of some 300,000 people off Australia's southeast coast.

A prominent U.S. psychiatrist who specializes in ritual abuse, and who is intimately familiar with Australian psychiatry over the past three decades, when queried by this news service as to why in the world Dax would move to Tasmania, replied:

"Tasmania is the Appalachia of Australia. There is a lot of alcoholism, a lot of incest. It is the poorest of all the states, very primitive, with a lot of descendants from very violent criminals from the British days. You will find many people there with no value system, no super-ego.

"It is the perfect place for Manchurian candidates, and for all sorts of experiments. He could do whatever he wanted there."

Something of great interest must have been taking place in Tasmania, because two of Tavistock's leading international operatives, the Melbourne-based Dr. Alan Stoller, a past president of the World Federation of Mental Health and a close associate of John Rawlings Rees and of Dax, and Dr. John Bowlby, went to Tasmania for extended visits in 1971 and 1972, respectively.

"In February 1984 Mr. Bryant was assessed by a very experienced clinical psychiatrist, Dr. Cunningham-Dax," an evaluation which set the parameters for all further treatment of Bryant.

That Bryant's actions, and even his very words, had been choreographed, was also the assessment of the man who dealt most closely with him, Sgt. Terry McCarthy, the police negotiator during the siege at Seascape. McCarthy recalled with some amazement how very calm Bryant, who was then calling himself "Jamie," was throughout the siege.

Author Mike Bingham interviewed McCarthy and summarized his observations in his book: McCarthy had "found that parts of his [Bryant's] conversation seemed prepared in advance, and it had become clear that some of what Bryant had done was extremely well planned."

Then, several weeks after the Port Arthur massacre, 23-year-old Dion Garry Yost went on a shooting rampage in the Northern Territory town of Palmerston, in which he wounded one civilian and four police officers. Yost had attended, several years after Bryant had, the same Tasmanian high school!

The great usefulness of MPD for Tavistock controllers, is that different personalities, whose existence is not even known to the main personality, may be programmed to carry out distinct tasks, but unless those personalities are later "accessed," the main personality will have only a fragmentary idea, if any at all, of what has happened.

He originally pled "not guilty" to 72 counts of murder and mayhem. With a new lawyer, and under pressure, he changed that to "guilty," which ensured that there would be no trial. Indeed, as Mullen stated at the outset of his psychiatric report for Bryant's new lawyer,

"This report is intended to clarify for the court why an insanity plea was not considered appropriate...."

However, the decision to find Bryant sane, together with his sudden change of mind to plead "guilty," is of enormous benefit to those who want to make sure the truth never comes out.

Under Australia's law, if Bryant were found insane, then he would be monitored and periodically re-evaluated, to see if he regained his sanity.
Were he to do so, he would then be put on trial--and some more of Tavistock's handiwork would undoubtedly be exposed to the light of day.
http://members.iimetro.com.au/~hubbca/pam2.htm

I am so glad we have the media, the government, the courts to look after us, to keep us safe from nutters like Bryant. :roll:

Abs
Abstrakt
Truth Seeker
 
Posts: 22
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 12:22 am

Re: The Port Arthur Massacre

Postby newgirl » Sun Feb 22, 2009 10:44 pm

RE:

"The 2 witnesses that survived and that were in the Broad Arrow cafe on the day, both said, IT WAS NOT MARTIN BRYANT!
Funnily enough, both died suddenly...."

Jingos Tanya!
Do you know the names of these two and how they died?

I'd also like to add that I believe the Tas Govt REMOVED Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) from the compensatable injuries under the Workcover or Insurance scheme in the year or two leading up to the event.
Of course that was the main "injury" thousands of people suffered and will suffer from forever after this unnecessary, cruel, created, travesty of a lie and deluded men's murderous rampage.
~love embodies everything~
newgirl
Dedicated TMA Member
 
Posts: 62
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2009 11:02 pm

Re: The Port Arthur Massacre

Postby Tanya » Tue Feb 24, 2009 1:10 pm

Hey Newgirl,

Here's the site, you can read it all on, I'm pretty sure it was the owner of the Broadarrow Cafe.
Also Joe Vialls is now dead too, unbelievable.

http://home.overflow.net.au/~nedwood/JoeVialls.html

One of them apparently died in a car accident, the other from a heart attack....mmmm.
We'll never know, always suspect and live in regret.
Tanya
75+ Posts TMA Member!
 
Posts: 89
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 11:44 am

Re: The Port Arthur Massacre

Postby SATRI » Tue Feb 24, 2009 1:53 pm

Conky wrote:Questions still remain.

Read through this website, very interesting:

http://home.overflow.net.au/~nedwood/photos.html

Alleged Port Arthur gunman Martin Bryant. Photo on the left was used by the media to convince you of Martin Bryant's "guilt". Photo on right taken from a different angle, shows identical three men on balcony of the Broad Arrow Cafe, and the man alleged to be Martin Bryant running down towards the bus park at Port Arthur in the presence of a police helicopter. This frame was shot at 2.45 p.m., one hour and fifteen minutes after the mass murder was over! This damning photographic evidence by itself proves Martin Bryant was deliberately set-up, wrongly accused and wrongly convicted. Remember, a camera cannot lie.
The blonde man standing by the yellow Volvo in the bus park is wearing a dark-blue donkey jacket, in stark contrast with the running man, who is dressed only in a shirt. Other frames of this blonde man by the yellow Volvo prove he is wearing shoes of a completely different colour to those of the man running away from the Broad Arrow Cafe, as shown in the eight small frames on the collage.


Site Index:
http://home.overflow.net.au/~nedwood/portarthur.html

Another interesting site by Carl Wernerhoff
http://www.loveforlife.com.au/node/2116

Interview with Carl:
http://sydney.indymedia.org.au/node/51321

Was this a false flag which took away Australian gun owners the right to have semi & automatic weapons?

I disagree with the comment, 'cameras never lie' though.


YES
SATRI
Truth Seeker
 
Posts: 18
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 8:53 am

Re: The Port Arthur Massacre

Postby John Bursill » Thu Feb 26, 2009 11:59 pm

Port Arthur,

Who benifits?

Who could do the crime?

Where does the evidence lead?

Was it investigated or covered up?

It's pretty obvious something really stinks!

Regards John
John Bursill
Truth Seeker
 
Posts: 18
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 5:44 pm

Re: The Port Arthur Massacre

Postby arooooooooga » Fri Feb 27, 2009 9:32 am

What is quite clear is that this man is totally innocent. I think the reasons why are subject to speculation and until this poor man has a fair trial the reasons will never truely be known
shocking stuff from those who are in powerful positions

This guy did NOT shoot these people
arooooooooga
 

Re: The Port Arthur Massacre

Postby michelle » Tue Mar 03, 2009 11:36 am

Please could someone advise me where I could get a copy of the book "Murder, Massacre, Mayhem by Dale McGregor? I have read everything I can find on the conspiracy theory after visiting Port Arthur 3 weeks ago and I would dearly like to get a hold of the above book. I was "fooled" like the rest of the population and firmly believed it was an open & shut case but now think totally the opposite. The only thing I can't agree with is why? To get the gun laws changed seems a bit lame. Has anyone got a clearer motive theory?
michelle
Please Make Me Welcome, I'm New Here!
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 11:32 am

Re: The Port Arthur Massacre

Postby newgirl » Tue Mar 03, 2009 3:32 pm

Thanks Tanya.


~RIP Joe Vialls.~

Despite, and because of, these endless piles of information it is always good to remember one can always be wrong. We may never know ...
Perhaps one day I'll feel clearer about the answers of why and how these kinds of psyops can be created, and by whom. reading about a psychological warfare organisation like BMO certainly helps fill in the HOW.
For now, I'm content to ponder questions.

Thanks Abstrakt very interesting post
and Michelle, when I first learnt about this in 2002/3 it didn't make sense to me that it would just be a way to go about gun buyback. That horrendous carnage. Now, 09, that the energy changes of 2012 are buzzing, the economic crisis, the loss of civil liberties, further terror hoaxes, and possible terror hoaxes - 9/11, 7/7, Bali, the current A.C.T and N.S.W 3 month gun "amnesty" appeal, the potential for weather control by HAARP, the extreme weather, the fires, the rioting getting more intense in some countries, the subtle as a baby elephant New World "Order" clumsily pounding in.... I can almost envisage marshall law being called EVEN in Australia. I hope i don't see it but I can't help think we'd hardly be arsed to comply. "rack off maate it's a free country.....isn't it?"

I can ALMOST see why "they" dont want "us" to be armed now. Especially as some people propose agendas against our freedom in the extreme. It's just so funny people with guns ANYWHERE telling other people with guns they can't have them.

Another thing I have learnt is these staged "events" have very long range time plane planning, some seemingly over decades. It's a game, a military exercise, a turn on, a mind warp, a clinical procedure, collateral damage, a ritual, a power trip, a secret bond, a psychological OPERATION on all who can be affected. god only knows why people do what we do.
but when people are scared we are more easily led....PTSD anyone???


~'Remember, Nothing Real Can Be Threatened.
Nothing Unreal Exists.
Therein lies the peace of god..' ~
~love embodies everything~
newgirl
Dedicated TMA Member
 
Posts: 62
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2009 11:02 pm

Re: The Port Arthur Massacre

Postby Tanya » Mon Mar 09, 2009 11:34 am

Regardless of anybodies opinion...
Why has this man never been put on trial?
Easy.
If Martin Bryant was to be put on the stand, the evidence would be clear for all of the world to see.
Incapable, IQ66, mental capacity of an 11 year old. No way in hell.
How can this sort of thing happen in our lovely Australia?
I feel such shame.
How many other poor bastards are locked up like this, used...
Rot in hell to all of the people behind such an atrocity and deprivation of anybodies human rights.
Tanya
75+ Posts TMA Member!
 
Posts: 89
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 11:44 am

Re: The Port Arthur Massacre

Postby Reunite » Tue Mar 31, 2009 7:11 am

The Port Arthur Massacre was to disarm the population period.

Martin Bryant - Killer or clone

Image

In 1988 Australian newspapers reported New South Wales politician Barry Unsworth's claim that, "there would be no effective gun control in Australia until there was a massacre in Tasmania"

http://www.2012unlimited.net/Site.A.html

*"The shooter in the Broad Arrow cafe fired from his right hip at an average range of 12 feet without the benefit of a laser sight. Only 29 rounds were used to kill or injure a total of 32 people, accuracy and speed equivalent to the top 1% of counter-terrorist marksmen. Martin Bryant always fired his Webley Osprey air rifle from the left shoulder, because he is and always has been a left handed shooter".

Also Nexus Magazine published a fantatic article on the Port Arthur Massacre. You will need Adobe reader to view the pdf files

The Port Arthur Massacre: Was Martin Bryant Framed? Part 1 of 3
http://www.nexusmagazine.com/index.php? ... &Itemid=71

The Port Arthur Massacre: Was Martin Bryant Framed? Part 2 of 3
http://www.nexusmagazine.com/index.php? ... iew&gid=28

The Port Arthur Massacre: Was Martin Bryant Framed? Part 3 of 3
http://www.nexusmagazine.com/index.php? ... iew&gid=27
User avatar
Reunite
Committed Truth Seeker
 
Posts: 49
Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2009 10:25 am

Re: The Port Arthur Massacre

Postby flare » Tue Apr 07, 2009 6:23 pm

G'day Everyone,

First post, great site.

Another thing that suprises me in relation to the Port Arthur Massacre is why havn't crime television documentries such as Crime Investigation Australia etc reported on this event, seems strange doesn't it. I think the reason these sort of programs don't is because people will start saying bullshit to certain parts of the evidence because these sort of programs go into a fair bit of detail times witnesses etc.

Flare
flare
Truth Seeker
 
Posts: 23
Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2009 5:22 pm

Re: The Port Arthur Massacre

Postby Ree » Wed Apr 08, 2009 9:14 am

Good point Flare!!

Ree
Ree
TMA Constant Contributor
 
Posts: 437
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 11:29 am

Re: The Port Arthur Massacre

Postby MCLMM » Wed Apr 08, 2009 6:57 pm

I used to be in the army so I know that the form of "instinctive" shooting such as that allegedly used by Bryant during the Port Arthur massacre would probably only lead to a lot of holes in walls and windows, a few frightened people and an empty weapon. IF he did it, then they would have to have been what are termed "contact" shots - i.e. the muzzle of the weapon contacting the victim directly.

Contrary to popular public belief, "firing from the hip" is the most inaccurate way of shooting ever devised. You may as well throw a handful of live ammo at your target. You'll do more damage.

However, if Martin Bryant was seen with the butt of the weapon held against his stomach or sternum and looking directly down the line of the weapon with both eyes open, then that could reasonably be seen to be military instinctive shooting - it can be quite accurate with sufficient practice. Have you lifer civvies ever heard of such an odd sounding military CQB shooting technique? I know I hadn't.

This begs the question - If Martin Bryant was using military Close Quarters Battle style instinctive shooting, where did he learn it? From "Guns and Ammo" or "Soldier of Fortune"? Unlikely. If he did it, he was TRAINED to do it by a serving or former member of the military or police special units - that leads us to another possible conspiracy tangent.

The Port Arthur Massacre is not just fishy, it stinks like a bucket of week old prawns in the sun.

Anyone who has been watching the mainstream media would be well aware of the fact that over 40 people have been killed in massacres in the United States over the past week or so. Same has happened in Germany. Both countries are looking at legislation to ban or severely restrict the public ownership of "useful" weapons. Remember the Dunblane Massacre in the UK which led to the banning of military style weapons in private hands?

Once again, Australia and the UK are Big Brother's "test system".

I noted with interest that police in Sydney, after an undercover operation, stung a suspected black market weapons dealer and took an AR-15A1 (semi auto M16 assault rifle), a Chinese Type 56 (semi-auto AK47 assault rifle), a Sten submachine gun (800 rounds per minute) and a .50 calibre sniper rifle (range approaches 4km) off the streets. Yeah, I feel much safer now that there is no civilian ownership of military style semi-automatic firearms.
.
User avatar
MCLMM
200+ Posts TMA Member!
 
Posts: 268
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2009 8:41 am

PreviousNext

Return to Government Control and Deception

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron