"He’s going to shoot your main man!"

Details That Point to a Coverup At Port Arthur ----------------------------- Email: editor@shootersnews.addr.com


During the course of the night at Seascape ( where Martin Bryant was undeniably there ) in his telephone communications with Tasmanian Police Negotiator Terry McCarthy, Bryant ( who was calling himself "Jamie" ), told McCarthy he wanted a police sniper with an infra-red scope who was apparently closing in to move on because "he’s going to shoot your main man!"

To who was Jamie referring ? Who was "your main man" ?

Jamie's terminology indicates there was another person there with him and he had something to do with Tasmanian Police and that that person was involved in the incident that day otherwise why would he be calling him the "main man" and be a snipers target ?

The remark indicates also Jamie was relaying the information so they would not shoot their own people.

Was this "main man" the real gunman who did the shooting that day ?

This indicates Bryant believed he was playing some role in the events of that day - probably either through manipulation or mind control - but it is unlikely he had agreed or realized he was the fall guy for this operation. That is evidenced by him pleading not guilty for months afterwards and being seen to be in a sick looking state when he finally did.

Note - it is the belief of this website that Bryant was involved in what happened that day - but was not the killer and was being manipulated by others not really understanding what was going on around him. This is the only logical conclusion based on all the evidence available at this time.

Following the main man comment Bryant says "I'll blow this...." which indicates also he was aware at the time he was acting out some part in the seige play they were running that night. ( If a SOG sniper had shot the "main man" and Bryant was still on the phone afterwards it would have proven Bryant was not acting alone ( how would thay explain another body at Seascape and how could a dead body do the remainder of the things they had planned for that night and following morning at Seascape such as the fire ? ) and as a result the whole deception being laid out at Seascape of a lone gunman would be blown - which is what he was referring to. ).

The question remains WHO was this "main man" and because he was their "man" is that how he was allowed to slip out the back of Seascape in the dark that night and disappear along with any others who may have been there ? ( No other bodies were found at Seascape apart from the Martins and the hostage ). Is this why Seascape had to be burnt down - to destroy any trace of others being there and what they had with them ? And is this the main reason why Tasmanian and Federal Authorities don't want a Coroner's Inquest held into this incident - that the existance of and the identity of their "main man" might be discovered and all the others involved ?

The complete transcript of that conversation is below. You can download audio copy in mp3 format ( requires unzipping ), or listen online to audio copy in mp3 format ( requires Windows Media Player 7or similar - if you do not have it download it here WMP7 ).

McCarthy: Jamie?
Gunman: Okay. Hello. How are you?
McCarthy: I’m very well thanks Jamie. Yourself?
Gunman: Well, I’m well up to now. The past few 20 seconds. What I’ve actually found out man, is that one of your boys is right outside, northeast I’d say, with an infra-red scope. Would you just ask him to move on?
McCarthy: Right, we’ll do that, we’ll do that now.
Gunman: Cause he’s going to shoot, he’s trying to shoot, he’s going to shoot your main man!
McCarthy: No, I can guarantee.
Gunman: I’ll blow this, umm these you know, you know what’s going to happen.
McCarthy: I don’t want to see anyone hurt, alright,
Gunman: You just move him on.
McCarthy: Okay, I’m organising that now. I can also assure you that it’s not our intention to hurt you or see anybody else hurt, okay.
Gunman: Really.



Return to Port Arthur Links Page