The Gympie Response - 16 May 1996
----
Fringe Groups Respond
--------------------------------------------------
Email:
editor@shootersnews.addr.com
It is significant to note that the famous Gympie shooters meeting of 15 May 1996 was immediately attacked on TV by 2 members of Sydney's Jewish community - Rebecca Peters and Jeremy Jones.
Jeremy Jones branded the meeting organizers as radicals drawing thier ideas from the American Militia Movement* which the left wing Jewish run Clinton Administration had been trying to provoke an incident with since 1993 having done a trial run at Waco Texas in 1993 and Rudy Ridge Montana with tragic results.
Peters said the Gympie organizers, particularly Ian McNiven, shouldn't be allowed to have guns and then went into her usual attack on guns and shooters.
It is no surprise to be aware Peters had been pushing for a ban on semi-auto rifles since just prior to the Port Arthur Massacre and was linked to the NSW Branch of the ALP.
Nothing would have suited her more for massacre to happen like at Port Arthur & when it did one saw little grief displayed for victims but smiles ( as evidenced in the picture left ).
Given her insincere reaction the question now must be asked what knowledge of the massacre did she have prior to it happening ? ( Given her close links to Roland Browne )
This website would like to make a challenge to the media to interview Peters and Jones now on what they have to say about all the hard evidence on this website of the Port Arthur Massacre being manufactured by Tasmanian authorities ( without dodging any questions or facts ). We suspect they will refuse the interview.
It is also as relevant point that this website has reason to believe both Peters and Jones are holders of foreign passports and as such should not be telling local native Australians what they should do. ( Peters, who also had a conviction for possession of drugs, was only temporarily an Australian resident being born in Argentina to Jewish American parents who were US government employed, spent her early years in Costa Rica, and now is back home in New York peddling her diatribe to the United Nations ).( And Jones would hold an Israeli passport ). The Commonwealth of Australia Constitution in fact bars holders of such passports from sitting in Parliament ( that is, being politicans ) and these 2 should have respected the spirit of that law by not involving themselves in local political issues.
It is also a matter of record now that this website has proven that given that gun control supporters were behind the massacre at Port Arthur it is now clear that they are unfit to have any control over guns ( and that includes all government agencies ) and to continue to push their agenda on the public - and as a consequence the calls of Rebecca Peters are now proven to be the hogwash they always were.
It should be noted that non leftist members of the Jewish community at the time supported the rights of shooters and the sentiment echoed by the Gympie meeting.
It should also be noted that many right and centre wing ALP and Trade Union people regard the gun control people who are linked to the left factions of the ALP, Greens and Australian Democrats as being ratbags.
* The American Militia Movement was and is an adult paramilitary type movement where the boys go out and shoot their guns combat style just for fun and recreation. They are good bunch of lads and many are ex-military service men and women. Following what went on at Waco & Ruby Ridge in 1993 they declared a political war on the Clinton Adminstration and its supporters which responded by trying to demonise them as being radicals ( that war led to the destruction of the Democratic Party in the US Congress and Senate in 1994 with the Republicans gaining control for the first time since the 1950s ). It is clear from Jermey Jones statements in 1996 that he was drawing his ideas from and was linked to the Clinton Administration rhetoric.
Ruby Ridge involved an FBI seige at the home of a Idaho resident Randy Weaver wherein the wife and 2 children were shot down and killed in scurrilous circumstances by one agent - search warrant powers were abused - and the whole matter stemmed from paperwork concerning firearms and failing to appear in court on them when he was given the wrong court date.
See incident summary
Like Waco there was no need for such raid on his home when the matter could have been cleared up when Weaver went into town. He has since won substantial $ damages for loss of his family.
The incident was not reported in Australia at the time but caused considerable reaction in the USA and was reinforced by what happened shortly afterwards at Waco.
The 1993 Waco Texas seige of the Branch Davidians was an even larger abuse of process and has been subject to serveral Congressional Inquiries which found federal authorities made "bad decisions". It involved a deliberate creation of a seige at the religious group's premises when any queries about paperwork of guns purchased and orther allegations could have been handled when David Keresh went into town. Instead a seige was provoked in order to give publicity to the Clinton Adminstration's agenda in this area. It resulted in many deaths and injuries that need not have happened.
These incidents are akin to having a police raid at your house if the paperwork on your car rego or sale transfer wasn't exact. The average person wouldn't tollerate it and nor should shooters.( And it should be remembered that statistically cars cause more deaths and injuries than firearms ).
These type of incidents - raids, seiges and shootouts - are the type of mentality the gun control movement thinks are acceptable behaviour by authorities.
About the Australian Gun Control Movement ** -
It is important for the average person who has not had any close dealings with people in the gun control movement to realize that that movement is by and large made up of strange types of people like Peters and Jones and others - poofters and lesbiens, cranks and other weak types of people.
They are not normal people. Many of them show evidence of having mental and psychological disorders & problems and this is evidenced because they all have phobias about weapons ( and this is medically known as hoplophobia - an irrational fear of weapons - and is a known mental condition ). They are not the sort of people the average person would welcome into their homes.
They are also not real people.
This is because they peddle their ideas as being valid in the face of enormous evidence to the contrary wanting thier own way regardless of the truth. They push their ideas onto the public knowing they are false and apart from themselves believing them expect the public to also believe them. To them 1 + 2 = 4.
A past example of this type of thinking is their associates in government have run opinion polls asking rigged questions like "Would you prefer tighter gun laws or more gun massacres ?" and when they get the answer back they want to such questions then they parade the answer as being legitimate valid opinion poll and supporting their position and say shooters should actually welcome such changes. Designing polls like that as happened in 1987 - 88 is not objective conduct. It is not the sort of thing a real person would do.
This is exactly the type of thinking that would cause a big gun massacre to be covertly planned and manufactured to get their own way ( as happened at Port Arthur and in other massacres ). Accordingly they can only be described as aiding and abetting terrorism and there is increasing evidence it is THEY, not shooters, who represent a danger to public safety and should have substantial restrictions placed on their activities, and in the case of any of them who had prior knowledge of the Port Arthur Massacre ( and all the other massacres ) be placed under arrest and tried as accessories to murder and terrorism.
It is also important to realize because they are a group of odd people there are only a handful of them - their numbers are small because the average person wouldn't last long in their ranks. Yet they have a magicans ability to delude many others who do know known them well and are also a tool used by certain elites in the community ( red leftists and internationalist globalist right and their yes men in the media ) who are seeking to gain more control over the public's lives so they can rip more off us either by price rises or taxes.
Amongst them are also leftist political people who are merely wanting a career in politics or publicity seeking and are using the movement as a means to that end. There are also others who use it as a sort of social group but they are not the ringleaders of this movement - merely part of the associated rent-a-crowd.
If gun control advocates ( like Peters, & others ) were acting properly and objectively they would have demanded a full inquiry into the Port Arthur Massacre to find out exactly what the cause of the incident was ( just as happens with a car smash on the road or when an airliner falls out of the sky ). Because they are not running an objective agenda they don't do so and simply attack firearms in the community because their sole agenda is to remove them regardless of the truth.
They also represent a danger to public safety in advocating the removal of weapons from homes for self -defence at a time when home invasions and domestic crime is increasing. Their answer is to disarm the average person who generally complies with laws and do nothing about the domestic crime element because they know they won't comply to start with. They in effect support the proposition that people don't have any right of self defence and if someone enters your house to inflict harm you should either run out the back door or let them prevail but never fight back because in order to do so you'd have to have something to do it with and they don't want you to have anything. Again this is not what a real person would find as reasonable.
The people in same movements in other countries display similar attributes.
Having said everything above this website believes everyone involved with the gun control movement should be required to be assessed by the mental health authorities and treatment given for their phobia and other conditions. And each gun control group to be licensed and their members registered and subject to review by shooters groups as well as substantial restrictions - if not a total ban - placed on their activities and public statements.
Return to Port Arthur Links Page
** & This page see the Introduction & Credits page of this website concerning content on this website.