Witness Says Martin Bryant Not Gunman
----
Evidence That Proves A Deception At Port Arthur
----------------------------
Email:
editor@shootersnews.addr.com
Another witness to the events at the Broad Arrow Cafe stated the gunman was not Martin Bryant.
John Godfrey, an ex VietNam Veteran saw the gunman at the Volvo after he left the Cafe.
Later he was asked by police to ID him as Bryant and he refused saying in his opinion the man he saw was not the same man in the newspapers ( 2 days later ).
See statement below - page 3 of 3 page statement - second last paragraph.
This statement coupled with Grahame Collyer's and Jim Laycock's is sufficient to question whether Martin Bryant was the gunman ( irrespective of what other witnesses may have said ). It also backs up our photographic evidence proving the gunman was discernably different to Martin Bryant.
The problem the Tasmanian authorities have is the photo images from the video footage doesn't lie.
It should be stated Tasmanian DPP Damien Bugg didn't point out to the Court at Martin Bryant's sentencing these conflicting statements by Godfrey, Collyer and Laycock and several others. Nor did Bryant's lawyer John Avery either. This is deception by omission.
Again the question must be asked why wasn't this discrepancy followed up by police and the DPP ? Was it because they were told not to take any notice of evidence indicating it wasn't Martin Bryant.
Return to Port Arthur Links Page