ANOTHER PORT ARTHUR OR AUSTRALIA'S FIRST DUNBLANE ?
By Andrew S MacGregor
"If we don't get it right this time. then next time there is a massacre, and there will be, then they'll take all our guns off us."
Tim Fischer, the Leader of the National Party in Australia speaking to a group of shooters at Alice Springs in May 1996, shortly after the Australian Federal Gov't introduced 'Gun Control'. Tim Fischer retired from politics in 2001.
Tim Fischer was spot on. There was not a complete and total confiscation of firearms in Australia, and so we had to have more massacres. But the Gun Control Priestess has stated there have been no gun massacres since Port Arthur. That's true, but not for lack of trying. In fact just about every gun massacre in Australia was a stuff-up.
1987: Julian Knight- Hoddle Street massacre. Julian Knight was supposed to have been shot dead by the Victoria Police SOG (Special Operations Group) but instead was arrested by the members of the Fitzroy Divisional Van crew who failed to hear orders not to enter the scene. Knight's kill spree was also lacking in numbers killed.
1987:Frank Vitkovic-Queen Street massacre. The firearm supplied to Vitkovic was cut off at both the stock and the barrel reducing the firearm from a semi-automatic to a jamming single shot weapon. Vitkovic ejected more rounds due to this fault than he used to murder his victims. Again police were not permitted to enter the crime scene, but were ordered to wait for the SOG to arrive, which would have given the killer more than 30 minutes extra in killing time. It was at Queen Street that the unarmed victims first overpowered the gunman.
1990: David Gray at Aramoana, New Zealand. It took the NewZealand police anti-terrorist squad only 3 days to find and kill David Gray in the hamlet of Aramoana. seconded to this unit was the Tasmania Police SOG Sgt Micheal Charles Dyson, who later also featured in the Port Arthur massacre. So too did the Gun Control Professor Paul Mullen.
1991:
Wade Frankum-Strathfield massacre. Here Frankum's controller was a policewoman detective, who spoke to Frankum shortly before he shot himself. Fancy letting that cat out of the bag.1996: Martin Bryant-Port Arthur massacre. Too much planning and the biggest stuff-up ever. 7 Intelligence operatives killed. The first thing that went wrong was the ferry schedule changed a fortnight prior to the massacre, and no one picked up the different schedule. The second stuff up was that Martin Bryant left his AR10 in a gun dealer's shop for repairs and was unable to retrieve it before the massacre. Also noticed was that the killings started 90 minutes before Martin Bryant arrived at Seascape. Again Bryant's controller was Sgt Dyson of the Tassie police SOG's.
2001: James Knight-Melbourne Abortion Clinic. In this planned massacre, the gunman entered the room, placed a device on the door to stop it from being opened from the outside and then shot the security guard. However one of the patient's boy-friends jumped up and tackled the gunman and was then aided by other patients and their boy-friends. This was the second time that the intended victims were able to successfully apprehend the gunman.
2002: Erfurt Germany on 26th April 2002. This massacre follows the same modus operandi as the gun massacres in England, Australia and New Zealand. It was also used by the Gun Control lobby to push their Australian agenda. Stewart Beattie has written extensively on this massacre.
2002: Xiang- Monash University shooting. 22nd October 2002, the gunman was armed with 4 hand-guns, and was a licenced shooter, using the SSAA range at Springvale, but without being a member of any pistol club. The gunman killed 2 asian students and wounded 5 others including the lecturer before he was tackled by other students and the lecturer. As I have previously mentioned the controller of this massacre was Assoc. Professor Bret Inder. This was the third time that the intended victims had been able to defend themselves against the gunman.
The first thing that can be noted from these massacres is that there were three occasions when the intended victims were able to successfully defend themselves, thus aborting the scope ot the killings. This is detrimental for the required agenda of Gun Control. What is not obvious from this very brief account of Australia's gun massacres is that an evolution took place within the line of these massacres. Problems that arose with the first massacre were negated in subsequent massacres. For example, in the Hoddle street massacre, the shooter was too far from his intended victims, which resulted in less hits. In the next massacre, the scene was moved from the street to within a government building. However to carry the firearm to the intended scene, the firearms had to be shortened so as to fit into the bag, creating the jamming of the weapon which again reduced the number of kills. In the third Australian massacre, the killing took place in a shopping centre, which removed the difficulties of the previous two massacres, but then there were the moves just prior to the gunman suiciding, and this was where the controller was able to be identified.
The shooting at the Abortion Clinic in Melbourne to me had a feminist and anti-Christian bias within its planning so as to demonise those people who believe abortion is a sin. I recall there was a similar shooting in America, and I believe these events would have parallelled each other. This is the same modus operandi as was used in the Okalahoma bombing to demonise the American Militia.
What is happening today is exactly what has happened previously, especially in 2001 and 2002. The Port Arthur massacre has been used to instil the fear and trauma within the community. In 2001 we than had the NSW Education Minister citing the case of a school-boy bringing a hand-gun to school. The fact that the evidence presented in the NSW's parliament was erroneous didn't matter. The boy had a plastic cap gun, and had asked permission to bring it and received that permission.
This year just after the 10th anniversary of Port Arthur we had a Queensland teacher arrested after police searched his premises and discovered several bombs in his garage.
Alright , all the ingredients have been put in place. Samantha Lee has told her tale, Roland Browne has warned of another 'Dunblane' occurring in Australia, and a teacher has been arrested for manufacturing 'bombs'. Now all they will do is sit back and wait and let the whole lesson die down. After a suitable time we will have the massacre, and again these voices, Samantha Lee and Roland Browne and others such as the Reverend Tim Costello will all chime in with "We told you so".
How do we know that the next massacre will be at a school or kindergarten. The most successful gun massacres have been at schools, Dunblane in Scotland, Columbine in America and Erfurt in Germany. The effort at Monash University in 2002 was the third time that the gunman was successfully captured by the sacrificial lambs. School children cannot defend themselves against an adult. The biggest trauma from Port Arthur was the murder of the Mikac children. The Gun Control has no option now but to use the 'Save the Children' card.
Roland Browne never mentioned the Monash University shooting nor the new guns laws that emanated from that tragedy. Samantha Lee did mention the Monash University, but ignored the laws and simply stated Monash didn't fit into the 'massacre' category. They have instigated their first step into the removal of handguns with the Monash shootings. Now they are planning on further incursions into the rights of the people to protect themselves and the possession of firearms.
So, what can you do about it. To me the first thing I would do is print off this article and take it to your local member. Present it to your local member and state very strongly, "If there is a massacre of school children in this state, I will hold you personally liable. You have the authority and the ability to stop such an agenda. If any of my family suffers in any manner because of such a massacre, I will hold you as being responsible for that suffering."
This is not a threat, you will not threaten, you will simply state the facts.
The second thing that can be done is what happened in America in the immediate aftermath of 911. Over 1000 women went out and got a gun licence and armed themselves with a hand gun. They felt threatened, they acted accordingly. If Australian women, mothers of young children, grandmothers aunts or whatever went off and joined their local pistol club, and learned how to shoot, and had possession of a firearm, all legal and above board, perhaps they could say to the likes of Lee, Browne and Howard, I am willing to die to protect my children. Are You?
With luck, or with God on our side, we may be able to stop such a massacre from again occurring
Andrew S. MacGregor