Broad Arrow Cafe -The Bryant Lookalike
Facts That Point to a Deception At Port Arthur
-------------------------------
Email:
editor@shootersnews.addr.com
The shooting and massacre at Port Arthur Historic Site started moments after a man with long blond hair walked into the Broad Arrow Cafe carrying either 1 or 2 sports bags. One of those bags contained personal effects of Martin Bryant - including his bulky video camera. The question must be asked why would Bryant take those things into the cafe if he planned a massacre, or was it someone else trying to incriminate him ?
Photographic analysis of the gunman who was filmed in the carpark after he left the cafe proves it was not Martin Bryant but someone else wearing a wig made up to look like Martin Bryant.
The two photos below tell the truth of the Cafe gunman. On the left is a picture Martin Bryant taken on 25th April 1996 - 3 days before the massacre. Note the LENGTH of his hair - just an inch above shoulder length and somewhat CURLEY. On the right is a frame from one of the tourist videos taken on the 28th April of the gunman in the carpark - note that the hair length exceeds the shoulders and the gunman has the overcoat collar up to hide the hair length and that the hair is STRAIGHT, not curley. This particular frame on the video came at point when either a breeze blew the hair on left side out from under the overcoat's collar or was the result of the gunman's own movements - irrespective of which you can clearly see the hair length exceeds the shoulder. The ease of movement of the gunman's hair indicates it is a WIG. More frames from that video are below which demonstrate more how straight the gunman's hair is and how the overcoat's collar was used to try and hide its length.
Martin Bryant on 25th April 1996 LEFT.
Port Arthur Gunman ABOVE & BELOW on 28th April 1996.
The two lower frames show a dark central gap or part in the hair which again is evidence of a wig.
The complete video of these frames are on the CD ROM - refer details for ordering on this site.
You will see all this more clearly upon playing that video.
Frames from other tourist videos on the day show the same things.
In the frame on the right above you can see, if you look closely, how the hair just falls verticle as the gunman leans over - as strands of a wig would. The left frame shows even more strikingly how the collar was up to try and hide the deception of identity. All this indicates the gunman's head is likely to have been clean shaven which accounts for the ease of sway of this wig.
All of this creates a reasonable doubt as to whether Bryant was the gunman at the Port Arthur Historic Site.
On top of this there is no evidence proving Martin Bryant as being the gunman at the Port Arthur Historic Site that day - that he was physically there. Nor is there any evidence known to be left by the real gunman proving it wasn't Bryant but someone else - that raises the question why not ? The answer lies in the meticulous planning of the people involved in this operation who ensured the real gunman was not going to leave anything but a trail of circumstantial evidence pointing at, but not proving, Martin Bryant being there.
Return to Port Arthur Links Page