Conclusion -------------------------------

Details That Point to a Coverup At Port Arthur ----------------------------- Email: editor@shootersnews.addr.com


Given all the material presented in this website ( let alone that which is not on this site ) the sheer number of major irregularities just on the basis of normal probability must lead one to the conclusion there is something very wrong with the allegation Martin Bryant did all that on a day in April 1996.

With any crimes some irregularities in evidence will usually ocurr, however the number and type of them in this case is so fantastic that only a fool would believe the offical government line that an intellectually disabled person was capable of such cleverly thought out plan. The evidence also indicates, at the bare minimum, a coverup of the facts and an attempt to mislead not only the court but the people of Australia by Tasmanian authorities as to what happened that day.

The evidence clearly shows the DPP lied to the Supreme Court at Martin Bryant's sentencing given that his own allegations were contradicted by his own witness's statements, and others were involved.

What is required to rectify this state of affairs is a full proper coronial inquest into the incident.

Return to Port Arthur Links Page